Comparison

15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska vs Filets de colin d'Alaska

Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient15 bâtonnets panés de colin...Filets de colin d'Alaska
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 163 kcal 170 kcal
Fat 5.1 g 6.8 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.7 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.7 g 0.6 g
Protein 12 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska has 25% less fat (5.1 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Filets de colin d'Alaska has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Filets de colin d'Alaska has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).

Ingredients

15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska

Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC (POISSONS) 65% qualité sans arête* [Theragra chalcogramma sauvage, farine de BLÉ (GLUTEN), huile de colza, eau, amidons de pomme de terre et de BLÉ (GLUTEN), sel, GLUTEN de BLÉ, levure.

Filets de colin d'Alaska

Filet de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 75 %; Enrobage 25% (eau, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de _blé_, amidon de _blé_, fécule de pomme de terre, farine de riz, _gluten de blé_, farine de maïs, sel, dextrose, semoule de _blé_, épices, huile de citron, huile de citron vert, amidon de tapioca, persil déshydraté).

FAQ

Which is healthier: 15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska or Filets de colin d'Alaska?

Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

15 bâtonnets panés de colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons