Comparison

Pané au colin d'Alaska vs Filets de colin d'Alaska

Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPané au colin d'AlaskaFilets de colin d'Alaska
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 202 kcal 170 kcal
Fat 8.8 g 6.8 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1.1 g 0.6 g
Protein 10.9 g 14 g
Additives20
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de colin d'Alaska has 16% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 202 kcal).
  • Filets de colin d'Alaska has 23% less fat (6.8 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Pané au colin d'Alaska has 43% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Filets de colin d'Alaska has 22% more protein (14 g vs 10.9 g).
  • Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pané au colin d'Alaska

colin d'Alaska 59%, eau, amidon modifié, sel, épaississant: E461, curcuma, paprika, enrobant (eau, farine de blé), huile végétales

Filets de colin d'Alaska

Filet de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 75 %; Enrobage 25% (eau, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de _blé_, amidon de _blé_, fécule de pomme de terre, farine de riz, _gluten de blé_, farine de maïs, sel, dextrose, semoule de _blé_, épices, huile de citron, huile de citron vert, amidon de tapioca, persil déshydraté).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pané au colin d'Alaska or Filets de colin d'Alaska?

Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 202 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons