Palak paneer vs Palak Paneer
Overall, Palak Paneer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Palak paneer | Palak Paneer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 78 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Palak Paneer has 24% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 102 kcal).
- Palak Paneer has 56% less fat (3.1 g vs 7 g).
- Palak Paneer has 52% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Palak Paneer has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Palak Paneer has 38% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Palak Paneer has the better Nutri-Score.
- Palak Paneer is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Palak paneer lists: Milk.
- Only Palak Paneer lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Palak paneer
Eau, tomates 20%, épinards 17%, fromage frais 13%, huile de riz, oignons, amidon modifié de tapioca, gingembre, épices, sel de cuisine, sucre, ail, extrait de levure.
Palak Paneer
Spinat 48%, Tofu 19% , (Sojabohnen,Wasser, Säureregulator: Citronensäure; Salz), Wasser, Zwiebeln, Sonnenblumenöl, Kokosnussmilch (Wasser, Kokosnuss - extrakt), grüne Chili, Tomaten, Ingwer, Zucker, Maisstärke, Salz, Säureregulator: Natriumcarbonate; Kreuzkümmelsamen, Kreuzkümmelpulver, Kurkumapulver.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Palak paneer or Palak Paneer?
Overall, Palak Paneer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Palak Paneer has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 102 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Palak Paneer has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.