Comparison

Pain Scandinave wunderbrood vs Seeded Cob Sourdough

Overall, Pain Scandinave wunderbrood has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPain Scandinave wunderbroodSeeded Cob Sourdough
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 467 kcal 260 kcal
Fat 28 g 4.9 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0.8 g 2.5 g
Salt 1.5 g 2 g
Fiber 13 g 6.9 g
Protein 19 g 8.7 g
Additives00
AllergensSesame seedsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Seeded Cob Sourdough has 44% fewer calories (260 kcal vs 467 kcal).
  • Seeded Cob Sourdough has 83% less fat (4.9 g vs 28 g).
  • Seeded Cob Sourdough has 87% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Pain Scandinave wunderbrood has 68% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pain Scandinave wunderbrood has 26% less salt (1.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Pain Scandinave wunderbrood has 47% more fiber (13 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Pain Scandinave wunderbrood has 54% more protein (19 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Only Pain Scandinave wunderbrood lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Pain Scandinave wunderbrood

Flocons d'avoine complets sans gluten*, graines de citrouille*, graines de tournesol*, graines de lin concassées*, sésame*, graines de lin*, graines de chia (Salvia hispanica)*, flocons de millet complets*, poudre d'enveloppes de psyllium*, sel Issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Seeded Cob Sourdough

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pain Scandinave wunderbrood or Seeded Cob Sourdough?

Overall, Pain Scandinave wunderbrood has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Seeded Cob Sourdough has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 467 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pain Scandinave wunderbrood has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons