Comparison

Pain intégral Montignac vs Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g)

Overall, Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPain intégral MontignacVaasan Ruispalat Original (1...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 230 kcal 268 kcal
Fat 1 g 1.7 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1.1 g 3.1 g
Salt 1.3 g 1 g
Fiber 8.8 g 12 g
Protein 6.8 g 9.2 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pain intégral Montignac has 14% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 268 kcal).
  • Pain intégral Montignac has 41% less fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Pain intégral Montignac has 65% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g) has 23% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g) has 27% more fiber (12 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g) has 26% more protein (9.2 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g) has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pain intégral Montignac is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Pain intégral Montignac

Farines de _blé_ intégrales , eau, levain, farine de seigle intégrale, sel gris de guérande

Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g)

täysjyväruis (jauho, rouhe, mallas; Suomi), vesi, vehnäjauho, vehnägluteeni, jodioitu suola ja hiiva.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pain intégral Montignac or Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g)?

Overall, Vaasan Ruispalat Original (1 vpl 27,5g) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pain intégral Montignac has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pain intégral Montignac has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons