Onion Bhajis vs Confit d’oignon
Overall, Confit d’oignon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Onion Bhajis | Confit d’oignon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 10.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Confit d’oignon has 33% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 224 kcal).
- Confit d’oignon has no fat, while Onion Bhajis has 10.6 g.
- Confit d’oignon has no saturated fat, while Onion Bhajis has 0.9 g.
- Onion Bhajis has 87% less sugar (3.6 g vs 28 g).
- Confit d’oignon has 52% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Onion Bhajis has 83% more fiber (4 g vs 0.7 g).
- Onion Bhajis has 74% more protein (6.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Only Onion Bhajis lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Onion Bhajis
Onions (67%) Chickpea Flour Rice Flour Rapeseed Oil Ground Spices (Roasted Cumin Fennel Seeds Chilli Powder Turmeric) Coriander Salt Cumin Seeds Onion Seeds Green Chilli Purée Ginger Purée. Concentrated Lemon Juice Raising Agent: E450, Sodium Bicarbonate. Suitable for vegetarians 168ge HSICA BOIS
Confit d’oignon
Oignons 65%, sucre, caramel (sucre, eau), vin blanc (raisins), vinaigre de vin rouge, vinaigre de Xérès, sel, gélifiant : pectines, poivre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Onion Bhajis or Confit d’oignon?
Overall, Confit d’oignon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Confit d’oignon has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 224 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Onion Bhajis has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 28 g per 100 g.