Comparison
Okra vs Okra sliced rings
Overall, Okra sliced rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Okra | Okra sliced rings |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Okra sliced rings has 46% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Okra has 50% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Okra sliced rings has 20% more fiber (4 g vs 3.2 g).
Ingredients
Okra
okra
Okra sliced rings
Okra Sliced Rings
FAQ
Which is healthier: Okra or Okra sliced rings?
Overall, Okra sliced rings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Okra sliced rings has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Okra has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.