Nisu mega vs Puff de Trigo
Overall, Puff de Trigo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nisu mega | Puff de Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 393 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Puff de Trigo has 42% less fat (2.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Puff de Trigo has 98% less sugar (1 g vs 40 g).
- Puff de Trigo has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Puff de Trigo has 60% more fiber (10 g vs 4 g).
- Puff de Trigo has 49% more protein (14 g vs 7.2 g).
- Puff de Trigo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Nisu mega
paisutatud nisu (sisaldab gluteeni) 52%, suhkur, glükoosi – fruktoosisiirup, mesi 4%, linnaseekstrakt (sisaldab gluteeni), rapsiõli, kaltsium, emulgaator (rapsi letsitiin), sool, kaneel, maitseained (mesi), vitamiinide segu (kolekaltsiferool, tiamiinmononitraat, nikotiinamiid, püridoksiinvesinikkloriid, pteroüülmonoglutaamhape, kaltsium - D-pantotenaat), Teave allergeenide kohta on esitatud poolpaksus kirjas, Võib sisaldada vähesel määral piima,
Puff de Trigo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nisu mega or Puff de Trigo?
Overall, Puff de Trigo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Puff de Trigo has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Puff de Trigo has less sugar: 1 g versus 40 g per 100 g.