Monster Wheat Puffs vs Puff de Trigo
Overall, Puff de Trigo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster Wheat Puffs | Puff de Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 22 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.3 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster Wheat Puffs has 24% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
- Puff de Trigo has 95% less sugar (1 g vs 22 g).
- Puff de Trigo has 17% more fiber (10 g vs 8.3 g).
- Puff de Trigo has 50% more protein (14 g vs 7 g).
- Puff de Trigo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Monster Wheat Puffs lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Monster Wheat Puffs
Wheat (60%), Glucose Syrup, Sugar (14%), Honey (3.6%), Soluble Gluco Fibre, Stabiliser (Calcium Carbonate), Caramelised Sugar Syrup, Sunflower Oil, Vitamins and Minerals (Iron, Niacin (B3), Riboflavin (B2), Thiamin (B1), Vitamin D)
Puff de Trigo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster Wheat Puffs or Puff de Trigo?
Overall, Puff de Trigo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Puff de Trigo has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Puff de Trigo has less sugar: 1 g versus 22 g per 100 g.