Nautica - Filet de hareng vs Rollmops
Overall, Rollmops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nautica - Filet de hareng | Rollmops |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 5.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 14.9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rollmops has 34% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 154 kcal).
- Rollmops has 44% less fat (5.6 g vs 10 g).
- Rollmops has 66% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 4.1 g).
- Nautica - Filet de hareng has 89% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Nautica - Filet de hareng has 13% more protein (14.9 g vs 13 g).
- Rollmops has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rollmops is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Rollmops lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Nautica - Filet de hareng
57% hareng (poisson), oignon, eau, 3,5% vinaigre, sel, arôme naturel d'oignon, Pout contenir des traces d'œuf, de lait ot do moutarde.
Rollmops
Filets de harengs* 44% (Clupea harengus), eau, oignons (sulfites) 8%, sucre, vinaigre, cornichons, sel, épices
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nautica - Filet de hareng or Rollmops?
Overall, Rollmops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rollmops has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nautica - Filet de hareng has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.