Nautica - Filet de hareng vs Rollmops au Vinaigre
Overall, Rollmops au Vinaigre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nautica - Filet de hareng | Rollmops au Vinaigre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 152 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 10.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.9 g | 14.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rollmops au Vinaigre has 59% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 4.1 g).
- Rollmops au Vinaigre has no sugar, while Nautica - Filet de hareng has 0.5 g.
- Nautica - Filet de hareng has 17% less salt (3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Only Rollmops au Vinaigre lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Nautica - Filet de hareng
57% hareng (poisson), oignon, eau, 3,5% vinaigre, sel, arôme naturel d'oignon, Pout contenir des traces d'œuf, de lait ot do moutarde.
Rollmops au Vinaigre
Rollmops 60% (filets de harengs 80% - Clupea Harengus Pecne en Atlantique Nord-Est FAO 27 : Mer du Nord ou Ouest Ecosse par filets (incluant chaluts et dragues), cornichons 20%), eau, vinaigre d'alcool (20) 3%, sel, graines de _moutarde_, oignon, arôme, édulcorant : saccharine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nautica - Filet de hareng or Rollmops au Vinaigre?
Overall, Rollmops au Vinaigre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rollmops au Vinaigre has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rollmops au Vinaigre has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.