Comparison

Rollmops au Vinaigre vs Rollmops

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRollmops au VinaigreRollmops
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 152 kcal 161 kcal
Fat 10.3 g 10.9 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 2.8 g
Sugars 0 g 2.3 g
Salt 3.6 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 14.8 g 12.6 g
Additives16
AllergensFish, MustardFish, Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rollmops au Vinaigre has 39% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Rollmops au Vinaigre has no sugar, while Rollmops has 2.3 g.
  • Rollmops has 53% less salt (1.7 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Rollmops au Vinaigre has 15% more protein (14.8 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Rollmops has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rollmops lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Rollmops au Vinaigre

Rollmops 60% (filets de harengs 80% - Clupea Harengus Pecne en Atlantique Nord-Est FAO 27 : Mer du Nord ou Ouest Ecosse par filets (incluant chaluts et dragues), cornichons 20%), eau, vinaigre d'alcool (20) 3%, sel, graines de _moutarde_, oignon, arôme, édulcorant : saccharine.

Rollmops

Filets de _harengs_ marinés 45% (_harengs_ Clupea harengus pêchés en Atlantique Nord-Est, sel, acidifiant : E260), eau, oignons, cornichons, carottes, vinaigre d'alcool 1,7%, sel, sucre, graines de _moutarde_, acidifiant : E260, antioxydant : E330, E300, E223 (_sulfites_), conservateur : E211, édulcorant : E954, arôme.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rollmops au Vinaigre or Rollmops?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rollmops au Vinaigre has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rollmops au Vinaigre has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons