Comparison

Multigrano Light vs Linaza y Chía

Overall, Multigrano Light has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMultigrano LightLinaza y Chía
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 224 kcal 238 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 3.1 g 1.8 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 10.3 g 4.5 g
Additives22
AllergensGluten, Sesame seeds, SoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Linaza y Chía has 11% less fat (3.1 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Linaza y Chía has 42% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Multigrano Light has 41% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Multigrano Light has 56% more protein (10.3 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Multigrano Light has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Multigrano Light lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Multigrano Light

Harina de trigo integral y blanca, agua, levadura, multigrano (7%) (trigo, avena, quinoa, maíz, sésamo), gluten, masa madre (trigo), sal, salvado de trigo, sal, sal de sodio (INS 262ii), cloruro de potasio, azúcar, aceite vegetal, aceite de orujo natural, saborizante natural, fibra de soya.

Linaza y Chía

Harina de Trigo Integral y Blanca, Agua, Levadura, Avena, Linaza, Chía, Gluten, Masa Madre (Sólidos), Fibra de Maíz (Prebiótico), Aceite de Maravilla, Azúcar, Trigo Sarraceno, Vinagre, Aceite de Canola, Avena Molida, Harina de Cebada, Centeno, Avena Malteada, Cultivo de Masa Madre, Lecitina de Soya, Colorante Caramelo.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Multigrano Light or Linaza y Chía?

Overall, Multigrano Light has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Multigrano Light has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 238 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Linaza y Chía has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons