Miso vs Miso Easy (Traditional)
Overall, Miso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Miso | Miso Easy (Traditional) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 145 kcal | 100 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 8.2 g | 8.6 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miso Easy (Traditional) has 31% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 145 kcal).
- Miso Easy (Traditional) has 50% less fat (3.3 g vs 6.7 g).
- Miso Easy (Traditional) has 52% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Miso has 43% less sugar (3 g vs 5.2 g).
- Miso has 100% more fiber (3.4 g vs 0 g).
- Miso has 16% more protein (9.7 g vs 8.1 g).
- Miso is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Miso Easy (Traditional) lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Miso
soja français, riz rond mi-complet (41.5%), sel marin non raffiné, eau, ferment (Aspergillus orizae)
Miso Easy (Traditional)
soybean paste (water, soya bean, rice, salt), water, alcohol, yeast extract powder, salt, sugar, seasoned kelp extract (kelp, salt, dextrin)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Miso or Miso Easy (Traditional)?
Overall, Miso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Miso Easy (Traditional) has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Miso has less sugar: 3 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.