Milkfish Ball vs Fiskeboller
Overall, Fiskeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milkfish Ball | Fiskeboller |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 115 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 11.7 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Fish, Gluten | Fish, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiskeboller has 43% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 115 kcal).
- Fiskeboller has 52% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Fiskeboller has 76% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.7 g).
- Fiskeboller has 92% less sugar (0.4 g vs 5 g).
- Fiskeboller has 27% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Milkfish Ball has 30% more protein (11.7 g vs 8.2 g).
- Fiskeboller has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fiskeboller is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Milkfish Ball lists: Eggs, Gluten.
- Only Fiskeboller lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Milkfish Ball
MILKFISH, SURIMI(THREADFIN BREAM, SUGAR, SORBITOL, SODIUM TRIPOLYPHOSPHATE), TAPIOCA STARCH, WHEAT STARCH, SALT, EGG ALBUMEN, GARLIC, MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE, BLACK PEPPER, FISH(MILKFISH, THREADFIN BREAM), EGE, WHEAT
Fiskeboller
Fisk (60% hyse/torsk), melk, vann, potetstivelse, salt, krydder. Nedlagt i fiskekraft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milkfish Ball or Fiskeboller?
Overall, Fiskeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiskeboller has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fiskeboller has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 5 g per 100 g.