Comparison
Spicy Fish Balls vs Fiskeboller
Overall, Fiskeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spicy Fish Balls | Fiskeboller |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 140 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiskeboller has 53% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 140 kcal).
- Fiskeboller has 53% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Spicy Fish Balls has no saturated fat, while Fiskeboller has 0.4 g.
- Fiskeboller has 80% less sugar (0.4 g vs 2 g).
- Fiskeboller has 36% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Spicy Fish Balls has 57% more protein (19 g vs 8.2 g).
- Fiskeboller has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fiskeboller lists: Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Spicy Fish Balls
Not available.
Fiskeboller
Fisk (60% hyse/torsk), melk, vann, potetstivelse, salt, krydder. Nedlagt i fiskekraft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spicy Fish Balls or Fiskeboller?
Overall, Fiskeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiskeboller has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 140 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fiskeboller has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 2 g per 100 g.