Fiskeboller vs Fiskeboller
Overall, Fiskeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fiskeboller | Fiskeboller |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 116 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | Fish, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiskeboller has 43% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 116 kcal).
- Fiskeboller has 83% less fat (0.8 g vs 4.8 g).
- Fiskeboller has 69% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Fiskeboller has 81% less sugar (0.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Fiskeboller has 15% more protein (9.6 g vs 8.2 g).
- Fiskeboller is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fiskeboller
Fisk (46 %), (Alaska Pollock, kvitlaks, torsk), melk, tapiokastivelse, rapsolje, salt, naturlig aroma, krydderekstrakt, dekstrose, løk, hvitløk, alginat. fortykningsmiddel: E-401, E-412, Antioksidant: E-326, stabilisator: E-420, E-450, E-452, Kraft: Fisk, vann, salt, løk.
Fiskeboller
Fisk (60% hyse/torsk), melk, vann, potetstivelse, salt, krydder. Nedlagt i fiskekraft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fiskeboller or Fiskeboller?
Overall, Fiskeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiskeboller has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fiskeboller has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.