Suppeboller vs Fiskeboller
Overall, Fiskeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Suppeboller | Fiskeboller |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk, Alaska pollock, Hvitfisk | Fish, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiskeboller has 41% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Fiskeboller has 82% less fat (0.8 g vs 4.4 g).
- Fiskeboller has 56% less sugar (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Fiskeboller is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Suppeboller lists: Alaska pollock, Hvitfisk.
Ingredients
Suppeboller
_Hvitfisk_ 48 % (_hvitlaks_ (Argentina silus), hyse (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), _Alaska pollock_ (Gadus chalcogrammus)), _lettmelk_, tapiokastivelse, rapsolje, salt, krydder (muskatblomme, sort pepper), løk, gjærekstrakt, løpsstikke, hvitløk, koriander, allehånde, sukker, stabilisator: E451). Produktet er pasteurisert.
Fiskeboller
Fisk (60% hyse/torsk), melk, vann, potetstivelse, salt, krydder. Nedlagt i fiskekraft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Suppeboller or Fiskeboller?
Overall, Fiskeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiskeboller has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fiskeboller has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.