Fiskeboller vs Suppeboller
Overall, Suppeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fiskeboller | Suppeboller |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 116 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 4.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 6 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | Fish, Milk, Alaska pollock, Hvitfisk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Suppeboller has 77% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.3 g).
- Suppeboller has 57% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.1 g).
- Fiskeboller has 12% more protein (9.6 g vs 8.4 g).
- Only Suppeboller lists: Alaska pollock, Hvitfisk.
Ingredients
Fiskeboller
Fisk (46 %), (Alaska Pollock, kvitlaks, torsk), melk, tapiokastivelse, rapsolje, salt, naturlig aroma, krydderekstrakt, dekstrose, løk, hvitløk, alginat. fortykningsmiddel: E-401, E-412, Antioksidant: E-326, stabilisator: E-420, E-450, E-452, Kraft: Fisk, vann, salt, løk.
Suppeboller
_Hvitfisk_ 48 % (_hvitlaks_ (Argentina silus), hyse (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), _Alaska pollock_ (Gadus chalcogrammus)), _lettmelk_, tapiokastivelse, rapsolje, salt, krydder (muskatblomme, sort pepper), løk, gjærekstrakt, løpsstikke, hvitløk, koriander, allehånde, sukker, stabilisator: E451). Produktet er pasteurisert.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fiskeboller or Suppeboller?
Overall, Suppeboller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Suppeboller has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Suppeboller has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.