Mexican Style Rice and Avocado vs Végétal
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mexican Style Rice and Avoca... | Végétal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 118 kcal | 180 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 6.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 6.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Nuts, Peanuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mexican Style Rice and Avocado has 34% fewer calories (118 kcal vs 180 kcal).
- Végétal has 53% more protein (6.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only Mexican Style Rice and Avocado lists: Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Mexican Style Rice and Avocado
Cooked Rice (15%) (Water Rice) Cooked Red Rice (15%) (Water Red Rice) Sweetcorn (14%) Peppers (14%) Black Beans Avocado (10%) Tomatoes Chilli Infused Sunflower Oil Lime Juice Coriander Sugar Ground Spices (Cumin, Smoked Paprika, Black Pepper) Rapeseed Oil Tomato Paste Salt Cocoa Powder Garlic Purée
Végétal
Riz cuit 39% (eau, riz), lentilles cuites 23% (eau, lentilles), haricots azuki cuits 10% (eau, haricots azuki), concombre 7,9%, noix de cajou grillées 5,6%, huile de colza, cranberries séchées sucrées 3,2% (cranberries, sucer, huile de tournesol), ciboule 2,6%, coriandre, épices, jus de citron concentré, vinaigre d'alcool, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mexican Style Rice and Avocado or Végétal?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mexican Style Rice and Avocado has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 180 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mexican Style Rice and Avocado has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.