Makreelfilets in tomatensaus vs Schildmakrelenfilets
Overall, Schildmakrelenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Makreelfilets in tomatensaus | Schildmakrelenfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 168 kcal | 120 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 5.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 29% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 168 kcal).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 63% less fat (3.7 g vs 10 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 50% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 71% less sugar (1.6 g vs 5.5 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 31% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 40% more protein (20 g vs 12 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Schildmakrelenfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Makreelfilets in tomatensaus lists: Fish, Mustard.
Ingredients
Makreelfilets in tomatensaus
makreel (52%), water, suiker, tomatenpuree (3,5%), maiszetmeel, zout, gemodificeerd maiszetmeel, specerijen (bevat mosterd), kruiden, knoflook, paprika extract.
Schildmakrelenfilets
Schildmakrelenfilets (Trachurus murphyi), 64%, Wasser, zweifach konzentriertes Tomatenmark 12%, Salz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Makreelfilets in tomatensaus or Schildmakrelenfilets?
Overall, Schildmakrelenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schildmakrelenfilets has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 168 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schildmakrelenfilets has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.