Filets de Maquereaux à la Tomate et au Basilic vs Schildmakrelenfilets
Overall, Schildmakrelenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filets de Maquereaux à la Tomate et au Basilic
Schildmakrelenfilets
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de Maquereaux à la To... | Schildmakrelenfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 209 kcal | 120 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 43% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 209 kcal).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 74% less fat (3.7 g vs 14 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 69% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 3.6 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 27% less sugar (1.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 25% more protein (20 g vs 15 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Schildmakrelenfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Filets de Maquereaux à la Tomate et au Basilic lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de Maquereaux à la Tomate et au Basilic
filets de _maquereaux_ 56% - eau - double concentré de tomates 10% - sauce tomate 9,5% (tomate - amidon transformé de pomme de terre - sel - huile de tournesol - sucre - acidifiant : acide citrique - marjolaine - origan - thym - poivre) - huile de colza - vinaigre de vin blanc - sucre - basilic 0,8% - sel - arôme naturel de basilic 0,1% - épaississants : gomme xanthane et gomme guar, Les informations en gras sont destinées aux personnes allergiques ou intolérantes, Zone de pêche : Atlantique Nord-Est,
Schildmakrelenfilets
Schildmakrelenfilets (Trachurus murphyi), 64%, Wasser, zweifach konzentriertes Tomatenmark 12%, Salz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de Maquereaux à la Tomate et au Basilic or Schildmakrelenfilets?
Overall, Schildmakrelenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schildmakrelenfilets has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schildmakrelenfilets has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.