Filet de maquereaux à la tomate et au basilic vs Schildmakrelenfilets
Overall, Schildmakrelenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filet de maquereaux à la tomate et au basilic
Schildmakrelenfilets
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de maquereaux à la tom... | Schildmakrelenfilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 143 kcal | 120 kcal |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 16% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 143 kcal).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 54% less fat (3.7 g vs 8.1 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 45% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 31% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 35% more protein (20 g vs 13 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de maquereaux à la tomate et au basilic
Not available.
Schildmakrelenfilets
Schildmakrelenfilets (Trachurus murphyi), 64%, Wasser, zweifach konzentriertes Tomatenmark 12%, Salz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de maquereaux à la tomate et au basilic or Schildmakrelenfilets?
Overall, Schildmakrelenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schildmakrelenfilets has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 143 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de maquereaux à la tomate et au basilic has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.