Schildmakrelenfilets vs Makrillfiléer i Tomatsås
Overall, Schildmakrelenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schildmakrelenfilets | Makrillfiléer i Tomatsås |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 120 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 25% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 160 kcal).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 66% less fat (3.7 g vs 11 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 59% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has 35% more protein (20 g vs 13 g).
- Schildmakrelenfilets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Makrillfiléer i Tomatsås is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Makrillfiléer i Tomatsås lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Schildmakrelenfilets
Schildmakrelenfilets (Trachurus murphyi), 64%, Wasser, zweifach konzentriertes Tomatenmark 12%, Salz.
Makrillfiléer i Tomatsås
Makrillfilé (Scomber scombrus) 64%, vatten, tomatpuré 13% salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schildmakrelenfilets or Makrillfiléer i Tomatsås?
Overall, Schildmakrelenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schildmakrelenfilets has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schildmakrelenfilets has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.