Makhana vs Makhana piri piri
Overall, Makhana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Makhana | Makhana piri piri |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 332 kcal | 480 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 4 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Makhana has 31% fewer calories (332 kcal vs 480 kcal).
- Makhana has 90% less fat (2 g vs 20 g).
- Makhana has 96% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 8 g).
- Makhana has 89% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Makhana has 47% more protein (15 g vs 8 g).
- Makhana has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Makhana
Roasted Fox Nuts
Makhana piri piri
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Makhana or Makhana piri piri?
Overall, Makhana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Makhana has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 480 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makhana has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.