Mackerel Fillets vs Makrele Filets
Overall, Mackerel Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mackerel Fillets | Makrele Filets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 232 kcal | 276 kcal |
| Fat | 15.9 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22.2 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mackerel Fillets has 16% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 276 kcal).
- Mackerel Fillets has 28% less fat (15.9 g vs 22 g).
- Mackerel Fillets has 21% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 3.7 g).
- Mackerel Fillets has 10% more protein (22.2 g vs 20 g).
- Mackerel Fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Mackerel Fillets
Mackerel fillets 72%, Sunflower oi, salt
Makrele Filets
Makrelenfilets 72%*, Sonnenblumenöl 25%, Speisesalz, Wasser
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mackerel Fillets or Makrele Filets?
Overall, Mackerel Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mackerel Fillets has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 276 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mackerel Fillets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.