Comparison

Mackerel Fillets vs Makrele Filets

Overall, Mackerel Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMackerel FilletsMakrele Filets
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 232 kcal 276 kcal
Fat 15.9 g 22 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 3.7 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 22.2 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mackerel Fillets has 16% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 276 kcal).
  • Mackerel Fillets has 28% less fat (15.9 g vs 22 g).
  • Mackerel Fillets has 21% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Mackerel Fillets has 10% more protein (22.2 g vs 20 g).
  • Mackerel Fillets has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Mackerel Fillets

Mackerel fillets 72%, Sunflower oi, salt

Makrele Filets

Makrelenfilets 72%*, Sonnenblumenöl 25%, Speisesalz, Wasser

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mackerel Fillets or Makrele Filets?

Overall, Mackerel Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mackerel Fillets has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 276 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mackerel Fillets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons