Comparison

Mackerel Fillets vs Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva

Overall, Mackerel Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMackerel FilletsFiletes de caballa del sur e...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 232 kcal 335 kcal
Fat 15.9 g 28 g
Saturated fat 2.9 g 4.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 22.2 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mackerel Fillets has 31% fewer calories (232 kcal vs 335 kcal).
  • Mackerel Fillets has 43% less fat (15.9 g vs 28 g).
  • Mackerel Fillets has 32% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Mackerel Fillets has 10% more protein (22.2 g vs 20 g).
  • Mackerel Fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mackerel Fillets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Mackerel Fillets

Mackerel fillets 72%, Sunflower oi, salt

Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mackerel Fillets or Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva?

Overall, Mackerel Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mackerel Fillets has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mackerel Fillets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons