Comparison

Makrele Filets vs Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva

Overall, Makrele Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMakrele FiletsFiletes de caballa del sur e...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 276 kcal 335 kcal
Fat 22 g 28 g
Saturated fat 3.7 g 4.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Makrele Filets has 18% fewer calories (276 kcal vs 335 kcal).
  • Makrele Filets has 21% less fat (22 g vs 28 g).
  • Makrele Filets has 14% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva has 55% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Only Makrele Filets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Makrele Filets

Makrelenfilets 72%*, Sonnenblumenöl 25%, Speisesalz, Wasser

Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Makrele Filets or Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva?

Overall, Makrele Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Makrele Filets has fewer calories: 276 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Makrele Filets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons