Makrele Filets vs Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva
Overall, Makrele Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Makrele Filets
Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Makrele Filets | Filetes de caballa del sur e... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 276 kcal | 335 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Makrele Filets has 18% fewer calories (276 kcal vs 335 kcal).
- Makrele Filets has 21% less fat (22 g vs 28 g).
- Makrele Filets has 14% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 4.3 g).
- Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva has 55% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Makrele Filets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Makrele Filets
Makrelenfilets 72%*, Sonnenblumenöl 25%, Speisesalz, Wasser
Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Makrele Filets or Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva?
Overall, Makrele Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Makrele Filets has fewer calories: 276 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makrele Filets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.