Comparison

Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva vs Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft

Overall, Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFiletes de caballa del sur e...Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saf...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 335 kcal 206 kcal
Fat 28 g 12 g
Saturated fat 4.3 g 2.4 g
Sugars 0 g 0.4 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 24 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft has 39% fewer calories (206 kcal vs 335 kcal).
  • Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft has 57% less fat (12 g vs 28 g).
  • Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft has 44% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva has no sugar, while Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft has 0.4 g.
  • Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva has 63% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft has 17% more protein (24 g vs 20 g).
  • Only Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva

Not available.

Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft

Makrele (Fisch), Olivenöl und Salz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva or Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft?

Overall, Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Makrelenfilet im eigenen Saft has fewer calories: 206 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetes de caballa del sur en aceite de oliva has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons