Linsen Aufstrich vs Hummus Light
Overall, Linsen Aufstrich has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Linsen Aufstrich | Hummus Light |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 214 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | — |
| Protein | 4 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Linsen Aufstrich has 33% fewer calories (144 kcal vs 214 kcal).
- Linsen Aufstrich has 35% less fat (8.5 g vs 13 g).
- Linsen Aufstrich has 23% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Hummus Light has 46% less sugar (2 g vs 3.7 g).
- Hummus Light has 47% more protein (7.6 g vs 4 g).
- Only Linsen Aufstrich lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Linsen Aufstrich
Tomaten* 30%, grüne Linsen* getrocknet 10%, mark zweifach konzentriert 6%, Tamari Sojasauce* 4% Shilitake Pilze, Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat, IWasser, Sojabohnen*, Salz), Misopaste* (Reis, Wasser. Soßkartoffeln*, Sonnenblumenöl*, Zwiebeln*, Tomaten - Postfach 10 75 27 D-28075 Bremen www.allos.de Knoblauch", Paprikapulver*, Ingwerpulver*, Meersalz Leckere Linsen mit ausgewählten Gewürzen und Gemüse machen den Allos Linsen-Aufstrich so besonders lecker. Pflanzlicher Brotaufstrich mit Tomaten, grünen Linsen und Tamari Sojasauce 140g e Te
Hummus Light
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Linsen Aufstrich or Hummus Light?
Overall, Linsen Aufstrich has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Linsen Aufstrich has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hummus Light has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.