Leivonta-rahka vs Franse stijl magere kwark
Overall, Franse stijl magere kwark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Leivonta-rahka | Franse stijl magere kwark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 133 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 9 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Franse stijl magere kwark has 63% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 133 kcal).
- Franse stijl magere kwark has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 9.1 g).
- Franse stijl magere kwark has 95% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 5.8 g).
- Only Leivonta-rahka lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Leivonta-rahka
maitorahka (pastöroitu maito ja hapate), pastöroitu kerma. Maidon alkuperämaa Suomi.
Franse stijl magere kwark
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Leivonta-rahka or Franse stijl magere kwark?
Overall, Franse stijl magere kwark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Franse stijl magere kwark has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 133 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leivonta-rahka has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.