Kodujuust vs Franse stijl magere kwark
Overall, Franse stijl magere kwark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kodujuust | Franse stijl magere kwark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 1 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Franse stijl magere kwark has 55% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 109 kcal).
- Franse stijl magere kwark has 90% less fat (0.5 g vs 5 g).
- Franse stijl magere kwark has 90% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3 g).
- Kodujuust has 19% less sugar (3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Kodujuust has 37% more protein (13 g vs 8.2 g).
- Only Kodujuust lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kodujuust
Kodujuust, rõõsk koor, sool
Franse stijl magere kwark
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kodujuust or Franse stijl magere kwark?
Overall, Franse stijl magere kwark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Franse stijl magere kwark has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kodujuust has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.