Comparison
Kodujuust vs Fat Free Quark
Overall, Fat Free Quark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kodujuust | Fat Free Quark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fat Free Quark has 45% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 109 kcal).
- Fat Free Quark has 90% less fat (0.5 g vs 5 g).
- Fat Free Quark has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 3 g).
- Kodujuust has 23% less sugar (3 g vs 3.9 g).
- Fat Free Quark has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Fat Free Quark has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kodujuust lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kodujuust
Kodujuust, rõõsk koor, sool
Fat Free Quark
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kodujuust or Fat Free Quark?
Overall, Fat Free Quark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fat Free Quark has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kodujuust has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.