Comparison

High protein cocoa quark vs Kodujuust

Overall, High protein cocoa quark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHigh protein cocoa quarkKodujuust
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 97 kcal 109 kcal
Fat 3.9 g 5 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 3 g
Sugars 5.5 g 3 g
Salt 0.1 g 1 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 8 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • High protein cocoa quark has 11% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 109 kcal).
  • High protein cocoa quark has 22% less fat (3.9 g vs 5 g).
  • High protein cocoa quark has 20% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3 g).
  • Kodujuust has 45% less sugar (3 g vs 5.5 g).
  • High protein cocoa quark has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Kodujuust has 38% more protein (13 g vs 8 g).
  • Only Kodujuust lists: Milk.

Ingredients

High protein cocoa quark

Not available.

Kodujuust

Kodujuust, rõõsk koor, sool

FAQ

Which is healthier: High protein cocoa quark or Kodujuust?

Overall, High protein cocoa quark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

High protein cocoa quark has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kodujuust has less sugar: 3 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons