Comparison
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Grykiai
Overall, Grykiai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kasza gryczana niepalona | Grykiai |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 367 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 12.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Grykiai has 46% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Grykiai has 39% more fiber (5.9 g vs 3.6 g).
- Grykiai has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kasza gryczana niepalona
ekologiczna kasza gryczana.
Grykiai
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kasza gryczana niepalona or Grykiai?
Overall, Grykiai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kasza gryczana niepalona has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grykiai has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Kasza Gryczana
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Grano saraceno
Kasza gryczana prażona vs Kasza gryczana niepalona
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Kasza gryczana prażona
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Buckwheat
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Grykiai
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Makfa grechka yormasi 8...
Grykiai vs Kasza Gryczana