Comparison

Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr vs Grykiai

Overall, Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice
Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr

Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr

MAKFA · 800 г
a
Grykiai

Grykiai

Galinta · 4 x 100 g
a

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMakfa grechka yormasi 800grGrykiai
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — —
Calories 309 kcal 367 kcal
Fat 3.3 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.6 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 12.6 g 5.9 g
Protein 12.6 g 12.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has 16% fewer calories (309 kcal vs 367 kcal).
  • Grykiai has 50% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has 53% more fiber (12.6 g vs 5.9 g).

Ingredients

Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr

Not available.

Grykiai

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr or Grykiai?

Overall, Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Grykiai has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Kasza Gryczana Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Grano saraceno Kasza gryczana prażona vs Makfa grechka yormasi 8... Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Kasza gryczana prażona Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Makfa grechka yormasi 8... Grykiai vs Kasza Gryczana Grano saraceno vs Grykiai Kasza gryczana prażona vs Grykiai