Comparison
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr
Overall, Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Kasza gryczana niepalona
KuchniaLidla.pl · 500 g
Better choice 
Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr
MAKFA · 800 г
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kasza gryczana niepalona | Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 309 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 12.6 g |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 12.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has 71% more fiber (12.6 g vs 3.6 g).
- Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kasza gryczana niepalona
ekologiczna kasza gryczana.
Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kasza gryczana niepalona or Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr?
Overall, Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kasza gryczana niepalona has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Kasza Gryczana
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Grano saraceno
Kasza gryczana prażona vs Kasza gryczana niepalona
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Kasza gryczana prażona
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Buckwheat
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Grykiai
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Kasza Gryczana
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Grano saraceno