Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Buckwheat
Overall, Buckwheat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kasza gryczana niepalona | Buckwheat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | — |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Buckwheat has 19% less fat (2.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Buckwheat has no sugar, while Kasza gryczana niepalona has 1.3 g.
Ingredients
Kasza gryczana niepalona
ekologiczna kasza gryczana.
Buckwheat
3KCTPN\ @BUCHWEIZEN Zubereitung: Buchweizen und Wasser im verhàltnis 1:3 in einem Topf bei starker Hitze aufkochen lassen. Dann bei niedriger Hitze zugedeckt quellen lassent bis das Wasser aufgebraucht ist. Der Deckel des Topfes sollte wahrend des Quellens nicht ge6ffnet werden, damit der Dampf und die Warme nicht entweichen. Durchschnittliche Nâhrwerte pro 100g
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kasza gryczana niepalona or Buckwheat?
Overall, Buckwheat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Buckwheat has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Buckwheat has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.