Comparison
Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr vs Grano saraceno
Overall, Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr | Grano saraceno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 363 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12.6 g | 5.8 g |
| Protein | 12.6 g | 13.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has 15% fewer calories (309 kcal vs 363 kcal).
- Grano saraceno has 12% less fat (2.9 g vs 3.3 g).
- Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has 30% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has 54% more fiber (12.6 g vs 5.8 g).
Ingredients
Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr
Not available.
Grano saraceno
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr or Grano saraceno?
Overall, Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Kasza gryczana prażona vs Grano saraceno
Grano saraceno vs Kasza gryczana prażona
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Grano saraceno
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Grykiai
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Kasza Gryczana
Kasza gryczana prażona vs Makfa grechka yormasi 8...
Makfa grechka yormasi 8... vs Kasza gryczana prażona
Kasza gryczana niepalona vs Makfa grechka yormasi 8...