Comparison

Kasza gryczana prażona vs Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr

Overall, Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKasza gryczana prażonaMakfa grechka yormasi 800gr
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 104 kcal 309 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0.4 g 1.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.3 g 12.6 g
Protein 3 g 12.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kasza gryczana prażona has 66% fewer calories (104 kcal vs 309 kcal).
  • Kasza gryczana prażona has 67% less fat (1.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Kasza gryczana prażona has 73% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has 82% more fiber (12.6 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has 76% more protein (12.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Kasza gryczana prażona

kasza gryczana prażona

Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kasza gryczana prażona or Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr?

Overall, Makfa grechka yormasi 800gr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kasza gryczana prażona has fewer calories: 104 kcal versus 309 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kasza gryczana prażona has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons