Jufka pâte phyllo vs Färsk filodeg
Overall, Jufka pâte phyllo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jufka pâte phyllo | Färsk filodeg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 219 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 6.3 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jufka pâte phyllo has 27% fewer calories (219 kcal vs 301 kcal).
- Färsk filodeg has 25% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Jufka pâte phyllo has no sugar, while Färsk filodeg has 0.5 g.
- Jufka pâte phyllo has 82% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Färsk filodeg has 73% more fiber (6.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Färsk filodeg has 30% more protein (8 g vs 5.6 g).
- Jufka pâte phyllo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Färsk filodeg is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Jufka pâte phyllo
farine de blé, eau, amidon de blé, huile de tournesol, gluten de blé, sirop de glucose, frais, sel de cuisine, émulsifiant: lécithine de soja
Färsk filodeg
Vetemjöl, vatten, salt, emulgeringsmedel: sojalecitin, kaliumsorbat, surhetsreglerande medel: kaliumcitrat, natrium-diacetat, mjölbehandlingsmedel L-cystein, majsstärkelse
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jufka pâte phyllo or Färsk filodeg?
Overall, Jufka pâte phyllo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jufka pâte phyllo has fewer calories: 219 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jufka pâte phyllo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.