Comparison

Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp vs Panko breadcrumbs

Overall, Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJapanese Breadcrumbs Panko S...Panko breadcrumbs
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 362 kcal 380 kcal
Fat 1.7 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1.1 g
Sugars 3.8 g 2.4 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.8 g 4.4 g
Protein 15 g 9.7 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp has 47% less fat (1.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp has 64% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Panko breadcrumbs has 37% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Panko breadcrumbs has 82% more fiber (4.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp has 35% more protein (15 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp

wheat flour, yeast, salt

Panko breadcrumbs

Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin], Dextrose, Salt. Allergy Advice For allergens, including cereals containing gluten, see ingredients in bold. Suitable for vegans

FAQ

Which is healthier: Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp or Panko breadcrumbs?

Overall, Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Japanese Breadcrumbs Panko Semmelbrösel imp has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Panko breadcrumbs has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons