Comparison

Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon vs Hafer Porridge Beere

Overall, Hafer Porridge Beere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientInstant Oatmeal Apples & Cin...Hafer Porridge Beere
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 372 kcal 361 kcal
Fat 4.7 g 6 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 1.3 g
Sugars 25.6 g 6.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 0 g
Fiber 9.3 g 8.9 g
Protein 9.3 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon has 22% less fat (4.7 g vs 6 g).
  • Hafer Porridge Beere has 75% less sugar (6.5 g vs 25.6 g).
  • Hafer Porridge Beere has no salt, while Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon has 0.9 g.
  • Hafer Porridge Beere has 22% more protein (12 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Hafer Porridge Beere has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Hafer Porridge Beere lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon

WHOLE GRAIN OATS, SUGAR, DRIED APPLES, NATURAL FLAVOR, SALT, CINNAMON

Hafer Porridge Beere

Vollkom-Haferflocken (70%), lösliche Vollkorn-Haferflocken (18 %), gezuckerte und getrocknete Cranberrystücke (Cranberrys, Zucker), gefriergetrocknete Erdbeerstücke, gefriergetrocknete Himbeerstücke, gefriergetrocknete schwarze Johannisbeerstücke, Zitronensaftpulver (Maltodextrin, Zitronensaftkonzentrat). Hinweis für Allergiker Kann Schalenfrüchte und Milch enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon or Hafer Porridge Beere?

Overall, Hafer Porridge Beere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hafer Porridge Beere has fewer calories: 361 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hafer Porridge Beere has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 25.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons