Comparison

Icre de crap cu ceapa vs Tuna Steak

Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Icre de crap cu ceapa	Tuna Steak
Nutri-Score	e	a
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	648 kcal	158 kcal
Fat	69.3 g	6.4 g
Saturated fat	7.9 g	0.8 g
Sugars	0.1 g	0 g
Salt	1.6 g	0.9 g
Fiber	1.2 g	0 g
Protein	5.2 g	25 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	Fish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Tuna Steak has 76% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 648 kcal).
Tuna Steak has 91% less fat (6.4 g vs 69.3 g).
Tuna Steak has 90% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 7.9 g).
Tuna Steak has 43% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
Icre de crap cu ceapa has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
Tuna Steak has 79% more protein (25 g vs 5.2 g).
Tuna Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
Only Tuna Steak lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Icre de crap cu ceapa

Not available.

Tuna Steak

Skipjack Tuna 93%, Sunflower Oil, Salt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Icre de crap cu ceapa or Tuna Steak?

Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tuna Steak has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 648 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tuna Steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Varitas de Merluza vs Tuna Steak Icre de crap cu ceapa vs Soupe rouge de la mer Tuna Steak vs Sardine piccanti Melt in the middle smoke... vs Tuna Steak Soupe rouge de la mer vs Tuna Steak Icre de crap cu ceapa vs Varitas de Merluza Icre de crap cu ceapa vs Petits poissons frits Icre de crap cu ceapa vs Fiskekaker