Haringfilets in tomatensaus vs Salade de thon quinoa
Overall, Salade de thon quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haringfilets in tomatensaus | Salade de thon quinoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 9.5 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salade de thon quinoa has 25% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Salade de thon quinoa has 75% less sugar (1 g vs 4 g).
- Haringfilets in tomatensaus has 27% more protein (13 g vs 9.5 g).
Ingredients
Haringfilets in tomatensaus
Haringfilets 60% (vis), water, tomatenpuree (12%), raapzaadolie, suiker, rode paprika, zout, gemodificeerd maiszetmeel, zwarte peper extract, verdikkingsmiddelen: guarpitmeel, xanthaangom, Zuurteregelaar: citroenzuur, paprika extract.
Salade de thon quinoa
Quinoa blanc et rouge en proportions variables 28 % - thon 23 % - huile de maïs - pois chiches 8 % - carottes 6 % - poivrons rouges 6 % - haricots verts 5 % - petits pois 3 % - oignons 3 % - tomate 1 % - sel - arôme naturel de romarin - huile de tournesol
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haringfilets in tomatensaus or Salade de thon quinoa?
Overall, Salade de thon quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haringfilets in tomatensaus has fewer calories: 194 kcal versus 210 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salade de thon quinoa has less sugar: 1 g versus 4 g per 100 g.