Haringfilets in tomatensaus vs Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje
Overall, Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haringfilets in tomatensaus | Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 264 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 17.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 25.7 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haringfilets in tomatensaus has 27% fewer calories (194 kcal vs 264 kcal).
- Haringfilets in tomatensaus has 22% less fat (14 g vs 17.9 g).
- Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has no sugar, while Haringfilets in tomatensaus has 4 g.
- Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has 49% more protein (25.7 g vs 13 g).
- Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Haringfilets in tomatensaus lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Haringfilets in tomatensaus
Haringfilets 60% (vis), water, tomatenpuree (12%), raapzaadolie, suiker, rode paprika, zout, gemodificeerd maiszetmeel, zwarte peper extract, verdikkingsmiddelen: guarpitmeel, xanthaangom, Zuurteregelaar: citroenzuur, paprika extract.
Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje
White tuna, olive oil, sea salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haringfilets in tomatensaus or Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje?
Overall, Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haringfilets in tomatensaus has fewer calories: 194 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has less sugar: 0 g versus 4 g per 100 g.