Comparison

Haringfilets in tomatensaus vs Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive

Overall, Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHaringfilets in tomatensausFilet d'anchois a l'huile d'...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 194 kcal 180 kcal
Fat 14 g 10 g
Saturated fat 2.8 g 1.7 g
Sugars 4 g 0.3 g
Salt 1 g 15 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 13 g 23 g
Additives40
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has 29% less fat (10 g vs 14 g).
  • Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has 39% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has 93% less sugar (0.3 g vs 4 g).
  • Haringfilets in tomatensaus has 93% less salt (1 g vs 15 g).
  • Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has 43% more protein (23 g vs 13 g).
  • Haringfilets in tomatensaus has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Haringfilets in tomatensaus

Haringfilets 60% (vis), water, tomatenpuree (12%), raapzaadolie, suiker, rode paprika, zout, gemodificeerd maiszetmeel, zwarte peper extract, verdikkingsmiddelen: guarpitmeel, xanthaangom, Zuurteregelaar: citroenzuur, paprika extract.

Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive

filets d'anchois salés (60%), huile d'olive (40%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Haringfilets in tomatensaus or Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive?

Overall, Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons