Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive vs Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje
Overall, Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive
Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'... | Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 264 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 17.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 15 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 25.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has 32% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 264 kcal).
- Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has 44% less fat (10 g vs 17.9 g).
- Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has 43% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has no sugar, while Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has 0.3 g.
- Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has 92% less salt (1.2 g vs 15 g).
- Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has 11% more protein (25.7 g vs 23 g).
- Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive
filets d'anchois salés (60%), huile d'olive (40%)
Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje
White tuna, olive oil, sea salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive or Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje?
Overall, Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet d'anchois a l'huile d'olive has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ortiz Tonijn borrelblikje has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.