Comparison

Haferflocken vs Instant Oats+

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Haferflocken

Haferflocken

REWE Bio · 500g
a
Instant Oats+

Instant Oats+

Clare Valley Food · 500 g
a NOVA 1

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHaferflockenInstant Oats+
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 372 kcal 354 kcal
Fat 7 g 9 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 1.4 g
Sugars 0.7 g 1.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 10 g 12.6 g
Protein 14 g 16.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Haferflocken has 22% less fat (7 g vs 9 g).
  • Haferflocken has 53% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Instant Oats+ has 21% more fiber (12.6 g vs 10 g).
  • Instant Oats+ has 16% more protein (16.7 g vs 14 g).

Ingredients

Haferflocken

Bio Haferflocken Kleinblatt

Instant Oats+

86% Wholegrain Oats, 9% Chia Seed, 5% Quinoa Flakes

FAQ

Which is healthier: Haferflocken or Instant Oats+?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Instant Oats+ has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Haferflocken has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Haferflocken vs Gluten Free Jumbo Oats Honey Bunches of Oats Pr... vs Haferflocken Haferflocken vs Instant rolled oats Haferflocken vs Lemon Drizzle Flapjack Gluten Free Jumbo Oats vs Instant Oats+ Honey Bunches of Oats Pr... vs Instant Oats+ Lemon Drizzle Flapjack vs Instant Oats+ Instant Oats+ vs Instant rolled oats