Comparison
Grechka vs Orkisz Ekspandowany
Overall, Orkisz Ekspandowany has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grechka | Orkisz Ekspandowany |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 332 kcal | 366 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 8.1 g |
| Protein | 12.6 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Orkisz Ekspandowany has 27% less fat (2.4 g vs 3.3 g).
- Grechka has no sugar, while Orkisz Ekspandowany has 1 g.
- Orkisz Ekspandowany has 100% more fiber (8.1 g vs 0 g).
- Orkisz Ekspandowany has 10% more protein (14 g vs 12.6 g).
Ingredients
Grechka
Not available.
Orkisz Ekspandowany
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grechka or Orkisz Ekspandowany?
Overall, Orkisz Ekspandowany has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Grechka has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 366 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grechka has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.